2 Chronicles 11:19

Authorized King James Version

Which bare him children; Jeush, and Shamariah, and Zaham.

Word-by-Word Analysis

וַתֵּ֥לֶד

H3205

Which bare

to bear young; causatively, to beget; medically, to act as midwife; specifically, to show lineage

ל֖וֹ

בָּנִ֑ים

H1121

him children

a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or

אֶת

H853

properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)

יְע֥וּשׁ

H3266

Jeush

jeush, the name of an edomite and of four israelites

וְאֶת

H853

properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)

שְׁמַרְיָ֖ה

H8114

and Shamariah

shemarjah, the name of four israelites

וְאֶת

H853

properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)

זָֽהַם׃

H2093

and Zaham

zaham, an israelite

Analysis

Within the broader context of 2 Chronicles, this passage highlights salvation through declarative statements that establish theological truth. The theological weight of divine revelation connects to fundamental Christian doctrine about divine revelation, contributing to our understanding of God's nature and relationship with humanity. This verse contributes to the book's overall argument by building upon previous themes while advancing the overall message of 2 Chronicles.

Historical Context

The literary and historical milieu of the literary conventions and historical circumstances of biblical literature shapes this text's meaning. The historical development of salvation within the theological tradition of 2 Chronicles Understanding the ancient worldview that shaped the author's theological expression helps modern readers appreciate why the author emphasizes divine revelation in this particular way.

Questions for Reflection

In what ways does this verse's emphasis on divine revelation address religious pluralism and questions about the necessity of Christ, and how should the church respond?
In what ways does understanding divine revelation in its original context challenge or deepen contemporary Christian thinking about salvation?
How might the original audience's understanding of divine revelation differ from modern interpretations, and what bridges can be built between ancient meaning and contemporary application?